Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amy Northam's avatar

And just think you and @Laura (NOT Loomer) 📎🐜🐜 were having math troubles last night. Hopefully you don’t short-circuit @Martin D. Vasquez when he sees it 😉

Seriously though. The things about those numbers they aren’t telling you is that they just compared the death certificate year to the voter rolls. They didn’t check the date of death against the polling day. Also, the rolls don’t usually get purged until the end/beginning of the year in one mass recounting according to several county clerks I know. This is due to the way the systems are set up and when the death certificates get recorded by…da-da-dumb, the federal government.

As far as the non-citizens, also a bogus number especially since DHS reported them as ‘potential matches’ not confirmed non-citizens. Plus keep in mind several cities allow non-citizens to vote in local elections. 9.9 times out of ten those potential matches turns out to be because there are two with the same name and the database was a mismatch.

Martin D. Vasquez's avatar

While names of deceased individuals may remain on rolls for a brief period due to processing times between state agencies, rigorous auditing and cross-referencing with death certificates prevent fraudulent voting. Claiming these bureaucratic lags equate to active voter fraud is a significant misrepresentation of how election security actually functions. Dead men don't vote.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?